@Umer: I guess the last node in the LL is _not_ pointing to the head
back. Rather, its pointing to one of the intermediate nodes. That way,
N2 or N2.next might not ever be _head_. See example: 1->2->3->4->5->3,
where the last node points to the 3rd node in LL.



On Mar 29, 9:21 pm, Umer Farooq <the.um...@gmail.com> wrote:
> that's why i have a terminating condition. It will keep on iterating until
> ((N2 != head)&&(N2->NextPtr != head)) is true.
>
> head pointer of the linked list will be passed as an argument to the
> function.
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Navin Naidu <navinmna...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > @Umer: Its a singly LL and it has cycle. Both N1 and N2 will keep
> > traversing within the cycle.
>
> > On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Umer Farooq <the.um...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> I'll appreciate comments on the solution proposed by me. It works the
> >> following way:
>
> >> take two pointers, N1 and N2 pointing on the head of the list.
>
> >> Move N2 by two nodes, and N1 by a single node.
>
> >> When N2 reaches head again (or N2->Next is a head)
>
> >> then return N1 which will be pointing to the middle element of the list.
>
> >> Regards
> >> Umer Farooq
>
> >> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Mukesh Kumar thakur <
> >> mukeshraj8...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> hi! in my opinion we can find the middle element in the singly linked
> >>> which hv the cycle........
> >>> as we know the list doesnt support the concept of cycle coz it has only
> >>> one direction traversal........
>
> >>>> but if we take the case when the list hvng  the no of element equal
>
> >>> as we hv :
> >>>                      n element in the list
> >>> we hv to find the middle one
> >>>     in genral;;;;;simply we divide it in .........
> >>> n/2; or
> >>> if consider middle elment as a key ;;;;
> >>>          temp->link=null;
> >>>           temp->first=middle
>
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> >>> .
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> >>  --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> >> .
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > NMN
>
> >  --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to