@Saumya, This is a great approach. But it still has a small problem since there is a non-zero probability (though small) that we need to repeat this experiment infinitely many times to get a single random number in [1,7]. Is this the best we can do?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
