@Jitendra
Sorry for the previous post. There is a problem in my approach. I
overlooked that.
Working on it.. :(
On Jul 8, 9:03 pm, Jitendra Kushwaha <jitendra.th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @souravsain
> Consider your algo for the case
> int arr[] = {10,20,30,40,50,23,27};
>
> everytime when you increment the j you are missing on element i.e j-1 for
> further comparison
>
> --
> Regards
> Jitendra Kushwaha
> MNNIT, Allahabad
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
