The answer for first question would be a segmentation fault...since
none of a or b has been allocated any memory.
Had it been A *a=new A; then the call to a->print() would not result
into a segmentation fault.
I think the purpose of this question was to know about this pointer
concept about dynamic allocation and the statement A *b=NULL; was only
given to puzzle someone.
On Aug 19, 4:56 pm, luckyzoner <luckyzo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. Suppose a class A is given as :
>
> class A
> {
> public :
> void print()
> {
> cout<<"Hello";
> }
> }
>
> int main()
> {
> A * a;
> A* b = NULL;
>
> a->print();
> b->print();
>
> }
>
> What is the output?
>
> 2. Given an array containing 0,1,2 in any order. Sort the array in a
> single pass.
> 3. Write a code to implement spiral traversal of the BST.
> 4. Given a string containing the binary representation of a number.
> Write a code to find the 2s complement of the number.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
