@Dinesh,
Yes, we can't apply this method, if that's not allowed.

On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:31 AM, dinesh bansal <bansal...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Dhritiman Das <dedhriti...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> Given a array, A[1..n], do the following.
>> Start from i=1 and try placing each number in its correct position in the
>> array.
>> If the number is already in its correct position, go ahead. if (A[i] == i)
>> , i++
>> else if the number was already restored to its correct position, then it
>> is
>> a duplicate , so remember it and move ahead if (A[A[i]] == A[i]), dup =
>> A[i], i++ ;
>> else
>>   swap the elements at the current index i and that at A[i]'s correct
>> position in the array.
>> continue this until all numbers are placed in their correct position in
>> the array
>> Finally, A[missing] will be dup.
>> O(n)
>>
>>
> *...@dharitiman, good solution man. No expensive computation, no extra memory
> required. Only problem is it will change the input array to sorted order
> which may not be desired. *
>
>
>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Dave <dave_and_da...@juno.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Suppose that x is duplicated and y is omitted. Then the sum of the
>>> numbers would be 5050 + x - y. Similarly, the sums of the squares of
>>> the numbers would be 338,350 + x^2 - y^2. Calculate the sum and sum of
>>> squares of the numbers and solve the resulting equations for x and y.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>> On Aug 31, 1:57 pm, Raj Jagvanshi <raj.jagvan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >   There is an array having distinct 100 elements from 1 to 100
>>> >  but by mistake some no is duplicated and a no is missed.
>>> >  Find the duplicate no and missing no.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Raj Jagvanshi
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dinesh Bansal
> The Law of Win says, "Let's not do it your way or my way; let's do it the
> best way."
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to