For square matrix , link suggested by Amit would work. Finding a sub-
rectangle is tougher.

I would go this way; First scan from bottom right till top left and
for every Non-zero member in matrix create this pair ( width ,
depth ).

Width is  how many continuous 1's ( including itself ) are there to
its right,
Depth is  how many continuous 1's ( including itself ) are there down
wards

now select a point P(i,j) , which has value Pair ( W , D ) it means
W-1 columns to right and D-1 rows below are '1' , Note: it doesn't
give any info about diagonal
                                    entries to P , and we will see ,
we actually don't need them.

 Now think about all possible rectangles which could be made when P is
left top corner
 so go columnwise from i to  i + 1 , i +2 ,  i + (W-1) points ( call
it P' point ) , at every step, see the minimum depth for all points
between P and P' and keep calculating area by width X minDepth

 e.g. P has width = 3, depth = 4 and co-ordinates (i,j ) then go like
this
Area for A[i,j] and  P'[i, j+1 ]  = 2 X MinDepth( P, P')   //A1
Area for A[i,j] and  P"[i, j+2 ]  = 3 X MinDepth( P, P', P")   //A2  :
Note MinDepth is Minimum Depth of all three points so far
  Take Max of A1,A2 and you would have max rectangle which could be
created by having P as top left corner.

Now , keep traveling P throughout this Matrix.

There are few optimisation. A point with width W and depth D can AT
MAX has a rectangle with AREA MAX = W * D so next time consider points
only whose W * D > Max Area calcuated so far.E.g if you have already
got a point which has sub rectangle with area = 12 no need to look for
points which has such (W,D) pairs = ( 2,3) , (4,2) , (3,3)  etc .

Time complextiy :
First time reverse traversal O(m * n )  /// m Rows , n Columns
   Second time , MAX AREA calculation for each points , worse case
o(n) as we need to travel only column wise as explained above
   Above action to be done for m*n points so total O( mn * n ) =
O(mn^2)

So total Time = O ( m * n^2 )

Time complexity :O ( 2 * m * n ) as W and D pair for each entry has to
be maintained


Suggestions, Clarifications, Modifications ?
-Manish







-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to