Wish you all a vary happy and safe Diwali!

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:53 PM,
<algogeeks+nore...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bnore...@googlegroups.com>
> wrote:

>   Today's Topic Summary
>
> Group: http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks/topics
>
>    - Graph Theory Problem <#12c1bc6dc083548e_group_thread_0> [1 Update]
>    - HAPPY DIWALI FOR ALL...............<#12c1bc6dc083548e_group_thread_1>[1 
> Update]
>    - Happy Diwali .. <#12c1bc6dc083548e_group_thread_2> [1 Update]
>    - Happy Diwali! <#12c1bc6dc083548e_group_thread_3> [1 Update]
>    - Max pyramid path <#12c1bc6dc083548e_group_thread_4> [8 Updates]
>    - compression <#12c1bc6dc083548e_group_thread_5> [4 Updates]
>    - design_algo <#12c1bc6dc083548e_group_thread_6> [1 Update]
>
>   Topic: Graph Theory 
> Problem<http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks/t/94f550d17fdb7a6>
>
>    Raj <rajmangaltiw...@gmail.com> Nov 05 03:11AM -0700 
> ^<#12c1bc6dc083548e_digest_top>
>
>    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_partition
>
>
>
>
>   Topic: HAPPY DIWALI FOR 
> ALL...............<http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks/t/c9432e1d3f8bb4cb>
>
>    UMESH KUMAR <kumar.umesh...@gmail.com> Nov 05 03:40PM +0530 
> ^<#12c1bc6dc083548e_digest_top>
>
>
>    
> http://topwebdownloads.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/diwali-greetings-2.gif
>
>
>
>   Topic: Happy Diwali 
> ..<http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks/t/adaf4d0456d34a75>
>
>    LALIT SHARMA <lks.ru...@gmail.com> Nov 05 02:36PM +0530 
> ^<#12c1bc6dc083548e_digest_top>
>
>    Wish u all a happy diwali ...
>    --
>    Lalit Kishore Sharma
>    IIIT Allahabad (Amethi Capmus)
>    5th Sem
>
>
>
>   Topic: Happy 
> Diwali!<http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks/t/5c10d1754d2051b6>
>
>    sourav sain <souravs...@gmail.com> Nov 05 11:26AM +0530 
> ^<#12c1bc6dc083548e_digest_top>
>
>    Wish you and your family a Bright and Prosperous Diwali.
>
>    Regards,
>    Sourav
>    [image:
>    
> diwali-diyas.jpeg]<?ui=2&ik=4f1ebe5da5&view=att&th=12c1a980b57e423f&attid=0.1&disp=inline&realattid=f_gg4neyjf0&zw>
>
>
>
>   Topic: Max pyramid 
> path<http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks/t/9646a5dd56e88632>
>
>    "juver++" <avpostni...@gmail.com> Nov 04 09:40AM -0700 
> ^<#12c1bc6dc083548e_digest_top>
>
>    Use dynamic programming.
>
>
>
>
>
>    Dave <dave_and_da...@juno.com> Nov 04 09:50AM -0700 
> ^<#12c1bc6dc083548e_digest_top>
>
>    @Piyush: Treat the data as an implicit binary tree, with the children
>    of a[i] being a[2*i] and a[2i+1] if a[] is a 1-based array, or a[2*i
>    +1] and a[2*i+2] if a[] is a 0-based array. Traverse the tree and
>    accumulate the sum as you descend. When you reach the leaves, keep
>    track of the maximum sum and its path. When the traversal is finished,
>    you will have your answer.
>
>    Dave
>
>
>
>
>
>    piyush rai <piyushra...@gmail.com> Nov 05 12:48AM +0530 
> ^<#12c1bc6dc083548e_digest_top>
>
>    Thanks, I think that will work :)
>
>
>
>
>
>    "juver++" <avpostni...@gmail.com> Nov 04 01:19PM -0700 
> ^<#12c1bc6dc083548e_digest_top>
>
>    You are wrong. It's not a binary tree. Cause multiple elements have
>    adjacent childs.
>    Right solution is to apply DP:
>    dp[i][j] - maximum sum that is ends into i-th row and j-th column.
>    Then make only 2 transitions to the (i+1)-th row.
>    Complexity is n^2.
>
>
>
>
>
>    Dave <dave_and_da...@juno.com> Nov 04 08:31PM -0700 
> ^<#12c1bc6dc083548e_digest_top>
>
>    @juver++: Oops. Right you are! A corrected solution is just a little
>    more complicated. If the data is presented in an array as in the
>    previous posting, a[]={1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10} corresponding to the
>    triangle
>    1
>    2 3
>    4 5 6
>    7 8 9 10
>    then we let A(i,j) be the jth entry in the ith row, both 0-based, so
>    that in this example, A(2,1) = 5. Then the array can be treated as an
>    implicit DAG (directed acyclic graph) where the children of A(i,j) are
>    A(i+1,j) and A(i+1,j+1). Using the correspondence that A(i,j) = a[i*(i
>    +1)/2+j)], you can traverse the DAG the same way I described
>    traversing the binary tree.
>
>    Dave
>
>
>
>
>
>    piyush rai <piyushra...@gmail.com> Nov 05 09:30AM +0530 
> ^<#12c1bc6dc083548e_digest_top>
>
>    there is a better way to get a child of node at index i and level l
>    The child will always be @ index (i+l+1) and (i+l+2) then solve
>    recursively
>    keeping and array of length of level, top-down approach OR do a bottom
>    up
>    approach without using any extra memory.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>    Dave <dave_and_da...@juno.com> Nov 04 09:31PM -0700 
> ^<#12c1bc6dc083548e_digest_top>
>
>    @Piyush: Hmmm. Children of i = 0, l = 0 are a[0+0+1] and a[0+0+2].
>    Check.
>    Children of i = 0, l = 1 are not a[0+1+1] and a[0+1+2]; they are a[3]
>    and a[4].
>    Am I missing something?
>
>    Dave
>
>
>
>
>
>    Piyush <piyushra...@gmail.com> Nov 05 11:02AM +0530 
> ^<#12c1bc6dc083548e_digest_top>
>
>    sorry children of index i at level l should be
>
>    a[i+l] and a[i+l+1] ( it is 0 index array and the level starts from 1 ,
>    0
>    level signifies no elements)
>
>    lets take a simple example
>    a[0]=1 has two children and (0+1) and (0+1 +1) i.e a[1] and a[2]
>    for a[1] the children are at ( 1+2) and (1+2 +1) i.e. at a[3] and a[4]
>    for a[3] the children are at (2+2) and (2+ 2 +1) i.e. at a[4] and a[5]
>
>    I hope you got it now.
>
>
>
>
>   Topic: 
> compression<http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks/t/498f1baffb1f60b5>
>
>    Chi <c...@linuxdna.com> Nov 04 04:47AM -0700 
> ^<#12c1bc6dc083548e_digest_top>
>
>    Short: Without an distribution model, you can't. I.e. you have to give
>    us more information what kind of data do you want to compress ( text,
>    image, music, video, radio, etc. pp. ). Compression is always based on
>    redundancy.
>
>    Length: RLE, Golomb-Code.
>
>
>
>
>
>    umair <umirz...@gmail.com> Nov 04 10:58AM -0700 
> ^<#12c1bc6dc083548e_digest_top>
>
>    try to use huffmans encoding for such kind of compressions.
>
>
>
>
>
>    neeraj agarwal <itsneerajagar...@gmail.com> Nov 05 12:20AM +0530 
> ^<#12c1bc6dc083548e_digest_top>
>
>
>
>
>
>    piyush rai <piyushra...@gmail.com> Nov 05 12:41AM +0530 
> ^<#12c1bc6dc083548e_digest_top>
>
>    For input such as
>    00000001111111111111100000000000001111111111110000000
>
>    Can be written as:
>    0 7 14 14 12 7
>
>    The first character determines the the first character in the original
>    sequence.
>    Since there are only two possible values 0 and 1
>    the above should be read as
>
>    7 times 0 then 14 times 1 then 14 times 0 then 12 times 1 then 7 times
>    0
>    (i.e alternate the bit pattern after each value)
>
>    The worst case will occur when pattern alternates at each step i.e
>
>    01010101010
>
>    In this case answer will be
>
>    0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
>
>    Total space required will be of the order of the space required by the
>    previous sequence about 2*size of original input.
>
>    Is this correct?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>    On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:20 AM, neeraj agarwal
>
>
>
>   Topic: 
> design_algo<http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks/t/69f2628af1320982>
>
>    kanika suri <surfatheig...@gmail.com> Nov 04 10:08PM +0530 
> ^<#12c1bc6dc083548e_digest_top>
>
>    @juver++.Thanx 4 rplyin.
>    @mohit. I dont thnk so ur logic vl work in all cases.
>    --
>    regards
>    kanika suri
>    MCS 2nd yr
>    DUCS
>    University of Delhi
>
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>



-- 
Mihir Patil
3rd year, BE (Computer Science),
Joint Co-ordinator, Computer Science Association
Birla Institute of Technology and Science,Pilani
+91-9772974127

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to