thats right !
DP must be the best approach to solve it !


On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Akash Agrawal
<akash.agrawa...@gmail.com>wrote:

> In addition to these assumptions, you have also assumed that numbers are
> greater than 1 else * will lower the result.
>
> Regards,
> Akash Agrawal
> http://tech-queries.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Algoose chase <harishp...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> For this specific case since only 2 operators are used : + , *      and we
>> know that * is the operator that maximizes the value(provided both the
>> operands are not equal to one / none of the operand is zero and also given
>> that operands are +ve ).
>> Doing * operation as late as possible should suffice right ?
>>
>> For Eg: Do all additions in the first pass and do all multiplications in
>> 2nd pass.
>>
>> is there be any case where the above mentioned logic fails ?
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Amir hossein Shahriari <
>> amir.hossein.shahri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> you can  use an algorithm similar to matrix chain multiplication i.e. if
>>> dp[i][j] is the maximum value that you can get with the numbers v_i to v_j
>>> and in order to maximize it find k that maximizes ( dp[i][k]  op_k  dp[k][j]
>>> )
>>> v_i is the ith value and op_k is the kth operator
>>> obviously if i==j : dp[i][j] = v_i
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to