can't u presort one of them in O(nlogn)...??? On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:05 AM, dinesh bansal <bansal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think for unsorted lists, it will be O(n^3). > > > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:26 PM, juver++ <avpostni...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> There is no need to sort first two arrays. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Algorithm Geeks" group. >> To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > Dinesh Bansal > The Law of Win says, "Let's not do it your way or my way; let's do it the > best way." > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<algogeeks%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > -- Anoop Chaurasiya CSE (2008-2012) NIT DGP -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algoge...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
