the problem here is what if more than 1 pointers are corrupt?

Best Regards
Ashish Goel
"Think positive and find fuel in failure"
+919985813081
+919966006652


On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Logic King <crazy.logic.k...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I Think circular DLL should do...skip list is not required !!
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Ashish Goel <ashg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> wouldn't it be skip list or a circular DLL
>>
>> what if we have next as well as next->next pointers in every node. If the
>> LL is say a->b>c>d
>> if a->b is corrupted, a->c can be used to reach rest of the LL
>> if say b->c is corrupt,
>> a->c can be used to recover complete list...
>>
>>
>> is this better or skip list?
>>
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Ashish Goel
>> "Think positive and find fuel in failure"
>> +919985813081
>> +919966006652
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Kunal Patil <kp101...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> @Gaurav: You might want to say circular doubly linked list, didn't you ?
>>> coz without that, its not possible to reach last node if we are at first
>>> node or vice-versa.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Gaurav Aggarwal <0007gau...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> other solution might be to use doubly linked list, even if one pointer
>>>> gets corrupt, there is other path to reach the destination.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Ashish Goel <ashg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> given a single linked list, there is a possibility of pointer
>>>>> corruption, modify the data structure to ensure that the data is not lost.
>>>>>
>>>>> in my view a skip list is a good option, any other solutions?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>> Ashish Goel
>>>>> "Think positive and find fuel in failure"
>>>>> +919985813081
>>>>> +919966006652
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Gaurav Aggarwal
>>>> SCJP
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to