oh common.... take HASH of the image whuch need less space compare to original one.... :)
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:01 AM, DK <divyekap...@gmail.com> wrote: > @Santosh: It depends on the type of the image. An image cannot be > represented in a (lossy) compressed format using fourier or wavelet > coefficients if we are to detect modifications that are at the pixel level. > > For example: No compression technique will be able to compress an image > with pixels sampled from a perfectly random source. Hence, in the worst case > - we will have to store each and every pixel of the image. Improvements are > only possible if we are given that such images are rare or that the data in > the images is compressible or that we are allowed a certain degree of pixel > error tolerance. > > -- > DK > > http://twitter.com/divyekapoor > http://www.divye.in > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/algogeeks/-/LeY_7ttPal0J. > > To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > -- **Regards SAGAR PAREEK COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING NIT ALLAHABAD -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
