node *listing::rev(node *p)
{
    if(p->next==NULL)
    {
        head=p;
        return p;
    }
    else
    {
        node *t=rev(p->next);
        t->next=p;
        p->next=NULL;
        tail=p;
        return p;
    }
}

On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Nishant Mittal
<mittal.nishan...@gmail.com>wrote:

> void rev_recursion(NODE **head)
> {
>     if(*head==NULL)
>     return;
>     NODE *first, *rest;
>     first=*head;
>     rest=first->next;
>     if(!rest)
>     return;
>     rev_recursion(&rest);
>     first->next->next=first;
>     first->next=NULL;
>     *head=rest;
>
> }
>
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:53 PM, vaibhav shukla 
> <vaibhav200...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> struct node *reverse_recurse(struct node *start)
>> {
>>   if(start->next)
>>   {
>>       reverse_recurse(start->next);
>>       start->next->next=start;
>>       return(start);
>>   }
>>   else
>>   {
>>       head=start;
>>   }
>> }
>>
>>
>> in main
>>
>> if(head)
>>     {
>>       temp = reverse_recurse(head);
>>       temp->next =NULL;
>>     }
>>
>> "head and temp are global"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Navneet Gupta <navneetn...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was trying to accomplish this task with the following call , header
>>> = ReverseList(header)
>>>
>>> I don't want to pass tail pointer or anything and just want that i get
>>> a reversed list with new header properly assigned after this call. I
>>> am getting issues in corner conditions like returning the correct node
>>> to be assigned to header.
>>>
>>> Can anyone give an elegant solution with above requirement? Since it
>>> is with recursion, please test for multiple scenarios (empty list, one
>>> node list, twe nodes
>>
>>
>>
>>> list etc) before posting your solution. In case
>>> of empty list, the procedure should report that.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Navneet
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>   best wishes!!
>> Vaibhav Shukla
>>     DU-MCA
>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to