sry... misunderstood the question On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:43 PM, veera reddy <veeracool...@gmail.com> wrote:
> there is o(m+n) solution . > http://geeksforgeeks.org/?p=2405 in this link see method no 4 > > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:41 PM, ankit sambyal <ankitsamb...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> ya, I also can't think anything better than O(m*n) >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Algorithm Geeks" group. >> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > Regards , > P Veera Reddy Devagiri > Senior Under Graduate > Computer Science and Engineering > IIIT Hyderabad > Mobile no-+91-9492024783 > -- Regards , P Veera Reddy Devagiri Senior Under Graduate Computer Science and Engineering IIIT Hyderabad Mobile no-+91-9492024783 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
