The question is a bit tricky. Is it possible that the largest BST is somewhere in deeper depth, i.e. it is not necessarily consisting of the root?
On 5 August 2011 08:46, Aman Goyal <aman.goya...@gmail.com> wrote: > How to find the largest BST in a binary tree. > > > > 15 > / \ > 10__________ 20 > / \ > 5 _____7____ > / \ > 2_ __5 > / \ / > 0 8 3 > > The largest BST (may or may not include all of its descendants) from the > above example should be: > > ____15____ > / \ > _10 20 > / > 5 > > > Please do not post working code, logic/algorithm or link would be > preferred. > I know it will be through recursion , still the logic part of recursion is > not clear.. would be thankful if anyone could help. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > -- ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Please do not print this e-mail until urgent requirement. Go Green!! Save Papers <=> Save Trees -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.