The question is a bit tricky.
Is it possible that the largest BST is somewhere in deeper depth, i.e. it is
not necessarily consisting of the root?

On 5 August 2011 08:46, Aman Goyal <aman.goya...@gmail.com> wrote:

> How to find the largest BST in a binary tree.
>
>
>
> 15
> / \
> 10__________ 20
> / \
> 5 _____7____
> / \
> 2_ __5
> / \    /
> 0 8 3
>
> The largest BST (may or may not include all of its descendants) from the
> above example should be:
>
> ____15____
> / \
> _10 20
> /
> 5
>
>
> Please do not post working code, logic/algorithm or link would be
> preferred.
> I know it will be through recursion  , still the logic part of recursion is
> not clear.. would be thankful if anyone could help.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>



-- 
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Please do not print this e-mail until urgent requirement. Go Green!!
Save Papers <=> Save Trees

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to