@Sagar Dude , "oh common shashank...its not that easy u told....." I Hope You Understand the question properly ? or you are talking about "*bitonic sequence"* if not then just point the obvious or no-obvious bug in above algorithm, Same Algo is coded below by Yasir, also Kunal Also suggested some improvement to reduce the number instruction , i don't think anything wrong in the algorithm ??
Just Check The Code ,Still if anything wrong do notify me , i will seriously look at that again ? *Regards Shashank * CSE,BIT Mesra -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/algogeeks/-/XyZJK5SjreIJ. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
