we can do that too.
But if I return cur then I can myself print cur, cur->next, cur->next->prev.
for verification.

On 18 August 2011 11:56, Vijay Kansal <vijaykans...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We should return curr->next in the last statement of ur code
>
> On Aug 18, 7:08 am, Dipankar Patro <dip10c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > A slight change in above code:
> > make it
> > while(cur && cur->next)
> > ^^ other wise the code will crash at last element in a prefect list, with
> no
> > loop.
> >
> > On 18 August 2011 07:36, Dipankar Patro <dip10c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > I have come up with this:
> > > - Use only one pointer, NODE *cur
> > > - initialize cur to headref
> >
> > > - The main loop:
> > > while (cur)
> > > {
> > >   if(cur->next->prev != cur)
> > >      break;
> > >   cur=cur->next;
> > > }
> > > return cur;
> >
> > > ^^ I think the code is self explanatory. It just uses the fact that at
> > > loop, the prev of next to current won't be current.
> > > e.g. A<->B<->C<->D<->E<->F->C
> > > Though F is pointing to C, C won't be pointing back to F as the prev of
> C
> > > is pointing to B.
> > > Complexity: O(n)
> >
> > > On 18 August 2011 04:45, payal gupta <gpt.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >> ys...i guess i misinterpreted..the question..
> > >> ma fault...
> >
> > >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Brijesh Upadhyay <
> > >> brijeshupadhyay...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >>> At the node from where the loop just started.. anyway we could not
> use
> > >>> that logic , coz it isnt circular linked list!
> >
> > >>> --
> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > >>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> > >>> To view this discussion on the web visit
> > >>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/algogeeks/-/sr4w-kPmnEsJ.
> >
> > >>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
> >
> > >>  --
> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > >> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> > >> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
> >
> > > --
> >
> > >
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________
> >
> > > Please do not print this e-mail until urgent requirement. Go Green!!
> > > Save Papers <=> Save Trees
> >
> > --
> >
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________
> >
> > Please do not print this e-mail until urgent requirement. Go Green!!
> > Save Papers <=> Save Trees
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Please do not print this e-mail until urgent requirement. Go Green!!
Save Papers <=> Save Trees

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to