ok nair so tell me from where u found these questions?

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 9:19 PM, jestincobol nair <jestinco...@gmail.com>wrote:

> A binary search tree is defined as follows.
>
>     Each node has a key, a value, a (possibly null) left child, and a
> (possibly null) right child.
>     An ordering is defined on the keys to be stored in the tree.
>     For a given node nd, the keys of all the nodes in its left subtree are
> “before” nd’s key, and the keys of all the nodes in its right subtree are
> “after” nd’s key.
>     The depth of the root node is defined to be 0; the depth of any other
> node is 1 more than the depth of its parent.
>
> How would the next() function of a binary search tree’s iterator be
> defined, assuming no changes are made to the tree while the iterator is
> active?
>
> Note: next() should return the value at each node in order of the
> corresponding keys; also, assume for each answer that the iterator has been
> appropriately initialized before the first call to next().
>
> 1. using a queue:
>
>        nd = q.remove()
>        q.add(nd.leftChild)
>        a.qdd(nd.rightChild)
>        return nd.value
>
> 2. using a stack:
>
>        nd = stk.remove()
>        stk.add(nd.leftChild)
>        stk.add(nd.rightChild)
>        return nd.value
>
> 3. using a stack:
>
>        nd = stk.remove()
>        nxt = nd.getRight()
>        while (null != nxt) { stk.push(nxt); nxt = nxt.getLeft(); }
>        return nd.value
>
>
>
> 1 is correct
>
>
> 2 is correct
>
>
> 3 is correct
>
>
> None of these
>
>
> plz say ur answers for this ??
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 9:18 PM, jestincobol nair 
> <jestinco...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> @ sagar:no dude  !! dese are of not of citrix :)
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 9:14 PM, sagar pareek <sagarpar...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> @nair
>>> Are these questions of CITRIX?
>>>
>>> coz all these questions i already faced somewhere
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 9:12 PM, priya ramesh <
>>> love.for.programm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 5th is option 1 sorry
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> **Regards
>>> SAGAR PAREEK
>>> COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
>>> NIT ALLAHABAD
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>



-- 
**Regards
SAGAR PAREEK
COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
NIT ALLAHABAD

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to