why wont u consider those.. Its no where mentioned in the problem that u are not supposed to count those mahouts sitting on the elephants... The statement is just to make it tricky nothing else...
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Mani Bharathi <manibharat...@gmail.com>wrote: > how? > > mahouts sitting on the elephants shouldn't be considered > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/algogeeks/-/9hWKNBJXPYEJ. > > To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > -- Kind Regards Ishan Aggarwal [image: Aricent Group] Presidency Tower-A, M.G.Road,Sector-14 Gurgaon,Haryana.122015 INDIA Phone : +91-9654602663 ishan2.aggar...@aricent.com <puneet.ar...@aricent.com> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.