+1 dave Its giving 97 in my compiler. On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:22 PM, vishwa <vishwavam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> its 21 . > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:10 PM, vijay singh <vijaysinghb...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Think it as following... >> (++i + ++i) + ++i; >> i.e. >> (7 + 7) + 8; >> >> 1) calculate ++i i.e i=6 >> 2) calculate ++i i.e i=7 >> 3) calculate (i + i) i.e (7+7) = 14 because i is now 7 >> 4) calculate ++i i.e i=8 >> 5) calculate 14 + i i.e 22 >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Algorithm Geeks" group. >> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > -- Regards Kunal Yadav (http:/sourcebit.in/ <http://algoritmus.in>) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
