@WgpShashank: using linked list would be pain... because for all nodes lying in the same vertical line , we need to access every time form the head.
i guess using balanced BST would be better for eg if total number of vertical lines are n. then create balanced BST for i=0 to n-1....now every time node->data is added to the vertical line no. *i* . search for *i* in BST and update counter in that node. inorder traversal of BST will give us output in ascending order. wat say?? On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:41 PM, WgpShashank <shashank7andr...@gmail.com>wrote: > @all , i think linked list will be the best data structure for this. isn't > it ? > > Thanks > Shashank Mani > CSE,BIT Mesra > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/algogeeks/-/OY7Ivwd07voJ. > > To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.