@umer : did interviewer told any one of the solution provided in the  given
link below or different?

http://www.geeksforgeeks.org/archives/1155


On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Umer Farooq <the.um...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes that is exactly what they wanted. I proposed BFS for this solution.
> Anyway, there was another problem that I was able to solve; but the
> interviewer brought up a much more efficient approach.
>
> The problem was:
>
>
>    - Given a linked a linked list with one pointer pointing to next,
>    another pointer pointing to any random pointer in the list. The random
>    pointer can be before or after the current pointer or it can even be at the
>    same node. Write a piece of code that can produce an exact copy of the
>    linked list.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Umer Farooq <the.um...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes that is exactly what they wanted. I proposed BFS for this solution.
>> Anyway, there was another problem that I was able to solve; but the
>> interviewer brought up a much more efficient approach.
>>
>> The problem was:
>>
>> Given a linked l
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Gene <gene.ress...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Since there is no mention of weights, you are looking for any spanning
>>> tree. Primm and Kruskal are for _minimum_ spanning tree. They are
>>> overkill for this problem.
>>>
>>> You can construct a spanning tree in any graph with DFS.  Just record
>>> every edge you find that reaches a vertex that has never been visited
>>> before.  This has to find every vertex, and since you are recording
>>> only the first edge used to arrive at each vertex, these edges must
>>> form a tree. This works even if there are cycles.  The algorithm is O(|
>>> E|).
>>>
>>> Note that in general a graph doesn't have a single root. So you'd
>>> search from all roots.  Another way to think about this:  introduce
>>> your own dummy root and edges to each vertex where there are no
>>> incident "in" edges.  Of course you don't report the dummy edges.
>>>
>>> On Mar 12, 1:09 pm, atul anand <atul.87fri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > i guess they were talking abt spanning tree , so you can use prism or
>>> > kruskal algo to do the same.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Umer Farooq <the.um...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > Hello friends,
>>> >
>>> > > I recently had an onsite MS interview. One of the questions that they
>>> > > asked was:
>>> >
>>> > >    - Given a directed graph, write a program that takes root of the
>>> graph
>>> > >    and returns root of a tree which comprises of all the nodes of
>>> the graph in
>>> > >    the same way as they appeared in the graph (the graph contains no
>>> cycles).
>>> >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Umer
>>> >
>>> > > --
>>> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups
>>> > > "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>> > > To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>>> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> > > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> > > For more options, visit this group at
>>> > >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Umer
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Umer
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to