Good question. The problem is not well-defined. It's possible that 75 should be omitted because there are deeper subtrees to the left and right. But we'll never know for sure because examples don't make a good definition.
On Apr 8, 2:29 pm, atul anand <atul.87fri...@gmail.com> wrote: > i guess in the given link 1st example should inculde 75 ?? correect me if i > am wrong. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Doom <duman...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Here is the reference: > >http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3753928/finding-border-of-a-binary... > > > None of the proposed solutions is effective enough. Any ideas? > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/algogeeks/-/xjchdh2I_7MJ. > > To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
