Yes U are Correct.. in Such cases the Compiler itself has overcome ( or
tried to overcome)  the architecture limitations to some extends but what
will happen if U need say 128 or 256 or more values??

  Again U hv your compiler restricted limitation right?   So that what I am
talking about is.. Write a code which accept all the value yet fits in
8/16/32 bit compiler and architecture...

Yes I am talking more optimistic way as I am talking about embedded
technologies.But there will be one limitationl which can't be overcome and
that is the maximum registers available.

When your code finally runs it will be using assembly language.. where the
operation like R1=M[SP+8] kinda operation happens.. Now the more advance
processors will hv this register of 32 bit ( Guess intel i7 ships 64 bit as
well). but these registers are limited..unlike memories in heap.


So if M talking about 8085/6 processor, there are 8/16 of these 8 bit
registers.. So the max U can really force your calculation to have is
8*8=64 bit operation or 8*16=128 bit operation. singly.

but with latest intel i7's it can go much higher.. that why these
processors are expensive :)


On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:41 AM, pankaj joshi <joshi10...@gmail.com> wrote:

> @Victor: - hi i have tried with 2 array but the complexity will increases
> as the n grows.
>                 So can you please share your code, if you have done this
> already.
> @Prem:- Actually the ALU does only 32 bit calculation, but if i am telling
> about VC++(or can be any compiler)
>               support the calulation long long (8 byte , 64 bit), then the
> compiler will do the calculation such a way that
>               the result of the calculation save in two memory locations.
> ( i think, please correct me if i am wrong),
> @don: - Don actually the problem wants the full value not the truncated
> double values .
>             but anyway thanks for exp(log(n)*n) :)
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Don <dondod...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> How about
>>
>> exp(log(n)*n);
>>
>> Don
>>
>> On May 14, 10:58 pm, pankaj joshi <joshi10...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > I have written a program to find out n^n(n power n),
>> >
>> > long long unsigned int power(int n, int i)
>> > {
>> > if(i == 1)
>> > {
>> > return n;}
>> >
>> > else
>> > {
>> > if(i%2 != 1)
>> > {
>> > long long unsigned int mul;
>> > mul = power(n,i/2);
>> > return mul*mul;}
>> >
>> > else
>> > {
>> > return (power(n,i-1)*n);
>> >
>> > }
>> > }
>> > }
>> >
>> > This program is working fine for power(15,15), but it is overflow for
>> > power(16,16), as long long unsigned int is 2^64.
>> >
>> > Please tell me how to store the values more than 2^64,
>> > i had thing to store in array.
>> > Please suggest me .
>> >
>> > thanks ..
>> >
>> > --
>> >  Regards,
>> >
>> > Pankaj Kumar Joshi
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>  Regards,
>
> Pankaj Kumar Joshi
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Algorithm Geeks" group.
> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Algorithm Geeks" group.
To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.

Reply via email to