Tiger Tree Hash Best Regards Ashish Goel "Think positive and find fuel in failure" +919985813081 +919966006652
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Prem Krishna Chettri <hprem...@gmail.com>wrote: > For the cases where Storing the Value is the only Concern and (Not the > Retrieval efficiency), I would Suggest Something called DFA Subset > minimization.. Google for it ... and after the final subset as said U can > use something called DAWG for the most Most Optimal solution.. > > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Prakash D <cegprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> We can still improve this trie idea.. >> >> say we have urls like >> www.google.com >> www.goodbye.com >> www.google.com/transliterate >> www.goodstrain.com/good >> >> we can subdivide everything under "www.goo" >> I mean we can store each character as a node in a trie and call it >> like a "URL dictionary" >> >> >> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:43 PM, omega9 <tvssarma.ome...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On May 16, 10:33 am, atul anand <atul.87fri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> @amit : >> >> >> >> here is the reason :- >> >> >> >> each url sayhttp://www.geeksforgeeks.org >> >> >> >> you will hash following urlshttp://www.geeksforgeeks.orghttp:// >> www.geeksforgeeks.org/archiveshttp://www.geeksforgeeks.org/archives/19248http://www.geeksforgeeks.org/archives/1111http://www.geeksforgeeks.org/archives/19221http://www.geeksforgeeks.org/archives/19290http://www.geeksforgeeks.org/archives/1876http://www.geeksforgeeks.org/archives/1763 >> >> >> >> "http://www.geeksforgeeks.org"; is the redundant part in each url >> ..... it >> >> would unnecessary m/m to save all URLs. >> >> >> >> ok now say file have 20 million urls ..... .....now what would you >> do.?? >> >> >> > >> > I think the trie suggestion was good. Have each domain (with the >> > protocol part) as a node and then have the subsequent directory >> > locations as a hierarchy under it. >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> > For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >> > >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Algorithm Geeks" group. >> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
