@Shashi : please check previous discussion on this thread. On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:09 PM, shashi kant <shashiski...@gmail.com> wrote:
> well in that case there can be simpler ways to do it > do an inorder traversal while checking prev<cur<next ordering maintained > if not then make it in proper order ,although whole tree has to be > traversed to fix it. > > > > > > *Shashi Kant * > ***"Think positive and find fuel in failure"* > http://thinkndoawesome.blogspot.com/ > *System/Software Engineer* > *Hewlett-Packard India Software Operations. > * > > > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 12:43 PM, atul anand <atul.87fri...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> @Shashi : i dont see any difference....bcoz only 2 nodes are swapped >> ..after correcting it...it shud maintain BST property wich automatically >> retain original tree >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Algorithm Geeks" group. >> To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Algorithm Geeks" group. > To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Algorithm Geeks" group. To post to this group, send email to algogeeks@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to algogeeks+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/algogeeks?hl=en.
