A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.


        RFC 3177

        Title:      IAB/IESG Recommendations on IPv6 Address
                    Allocations to Sites
        Author(s):  IAB, IESG
        Status:     Informational
        Date:       September 2001
        Mailbox:    [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Pages:      10
        Characters: 23178
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:  None

        I-D Tag:    draft-iesg-ipv6-addressing-recommendations-03.txt

        URL:        ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3177.txt


This document provides recommendations to the addressing registries
(APNIC, ARIN and RIPE-NCC) on policies for assigning IPv6 address
blocks to end sites.  In particular, it recommends the assignment of
/48 in the general case, /64 when it is known that one and only one
subnet is needed and /128 when it is absolutely known that one and
only one device is connecting.
 
The original recommendations were made in an IAB/IESG statement
mailed to the registries on September 1, 2000.  This document refines
the original recommendation and documents it for the historical
record.

This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Steering Group.

This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Requests to be
added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
an EMAIL message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message body 
help: ways_to_get_rfcs.  For example:

        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Subject: getting rfcs

        help: ways_to_get_rfcs

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.echo 
Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC
Authors, for further information.


Joyce K. Reynolds and Sandy Ginoza
USC/Information Sciences Institute

...

Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant Mail Reader 
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version
of the RFCs.

rfc3177.txt

Reply via email to