To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=34733
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 20 02:59:58 -0800 2005 ------- Hi tuharsky, You are right that dataloss justifies a prio of 2. Problem is that no one here was able to reproduce it for now. To me it looks as if the macro-files (.xla/b) or whatever they are called have been manually edited since these files contain errors (see comment by tbe). Normally i would have returned the issue immediately. However, since you claim there is dataloss, i will give it another try shortly. Setting the prio to 4 is merely a cosmetic thing to ease queries on tasks that are confirmed and assigned to be fixed before Beta (or whatever a testrelease will be named), we have the instruction to do that. I keep an eye on this taks and will report back on tuesday. As long as the task is not closed i will be terrorized by nag-mails every few days ... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
