To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=42998
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 13:07:22 -0700 2005 ------- Before we can commit the packaging script we have to decide which method to use (pkg vs. tar) and if we can optimize the script with regards to hard coded numbers and paths. I can talk to the lead of the installation project if there is an easy way to get those variables from the openoffice.lst file in instsetoo_native, so only one file has to be changed in future versions. Could someone verify that the packaging problems under 10.3 are gone when switching to tar instead of pkg, as maho suggested ? On 10.4 both methods work fine, but I think on 10.3 there were lots of processes started while packing, right ? Additionally, the whole method breaks the possibility of installing language packs, because the installation paths cannot be found anymore after moving files around in the OpenOffice.dmg. One last thing: shouldn't we try to include fondu in the launcher ? The missing fonts are big acceptance problem I guess. The only concern I have with an automatic conversion is the additional space we will silently occupy with converted font files. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
