To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53506
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 5 15:01:50 -0700 2005 ------- Justin Kelley said: "Based on the example given, I'm not sure I agree with the terms being confusing. A background template can be considered an element of the overall slide design. "I then went over to PowerPoint and viewed the terminology over there, which isn't much different." That answer really baffles me. OK, "A" can be considered part of "B", but where is that explained in the documentation? Does that excuse the multiplicity of terms used for (what may or may not be) the same thing? Because the PowerPoint documentation on this is a mess, does that mean that OOo shouldn't strive to be better? Is MS the criterion on this? How hard would it be to clean up the UI and documentation to be CONSISTENT and CLEAR on this? Why not set a good example? I note also that in the Impress Forum, many of the questions are from folks puzzled about customizing their presentations. Hello? Doesn't that seem to say that there is something amiss? Or do we assume they are all idiots? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
