To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55597
                  Issue #:|55597
                  Summary:|changes in a sentence in a paragraph from style
                          |default to style definition effects whole paragraph
                Component:|Word processor
                  Version:|OOo 2.0
                 Platform:|PC
                      URL:|
               OS/Version:|Windows XP
                   Status:|UNCONFIRMED
        Status whiteboard:|
                 Keywords:|
               Resolution:|
               Issue type:|DEFECT
                 Priority:|P3
             Subcomponent:|formatting
              Assigned to:|mru
              Reported by:|yunkong





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct  7 01:44:58 -0700 
2005 -------
Hello,

Changes in a sentence in a paragraph from style default to style definition 
effects whole paragraph.

Tested on:
OS:  Windows XP (in networked environment Windows 2003 server; in home 
standalone environment, SP2)
Hardware: P4 1.6 GHz; P3 800 MHz
Open Office 2.0 (RC)

Steps to reproduce this:
1. Make style DEFINITION(Font: Times New Roman, Typeface: Cursive, Size: 12)
2. Highlight part in text ("as any event or outcome which could have reduced, 
or did reduce the safety margin for the patient. It may or may not have been 
preventable and may or may not have involved an error on the part of the 
healthcare team") and change style from DEFAULT to DEFINITION

Expected result: Only highlighted text changes

Result was that the whole paragraph changes from style DEFAULT to DEFINITION. 
I could be wrong and this is can actually be controlled by modifying the style 
in such a way that it only affects the sentence that is selected. In MS Word I 
this happens in that way.  


Whole text used:

>From the literature study it appeared that there are many taxonomies for 
undesired events [1,5]. Different terms are used, varying from ‘complication’ 
[6] to ‘adverse event’ [7] and from ‘human error’ [8] to ‘critical incident’ 
[9], each with a specific definition and context. Before being able to 
determine the most applicable one, we defined the main goal of the registry 
as ‘to estimate and detect patterns in the occurrence and severity of 
undesired events’: data that might lead to effective interventions. An 
expected side effect of implementing the registry is the increased awareness 
of ICU personnel for patient safety. In order to gain insight in the overall 
situation regarding unwanted events, a broad definition is required having no 
strict limitation as to what to report. Therefore, we finally opted for the 
term incident, defined by the Australian Incident Monitoring System in 
Intensive Care (AIMS-ICU) as any event or outcome which could have reduced, or 
did reduce the safety margin for the patient. It may or may not have been 
preventable and may or may not have involved an error on the part of the 
healthcare team [10]. 
Considering that according to this definition a planned, preventive operation –
causing a significant increase of the risk on complications, hence reducing 
the safety margin for the patient- would also be an incident, we extended the 
first part of the definition to any undesired or unintended event or outcome 
[6]. 

Regards,

A.Y.K. Jong

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to