To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55906
User hdu changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |INVALID
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 13 05:45:12 -0700
2005 -------
This truetype file has two CMAP subtables: A "Default Unicode" (aka CMAP 0.0)
and a "MS Unicode" (aka CMAP 3.1). Unfortunately these both subtables disagree!
The "Default Unicode" table claims that U+002B, U+002D, U+003D, U+0058, U+0067,
U+006C, U+0070, U+0071 and U+0073 (+-=Xglpqs) are missing in the font whereas
the "MS Unicode" table lists them. So the font is buggy.
The problem with different tables disagreeing with each other can not be fixed.
Is an "MS Unicode" table always more trustworthy than "Default Unicode" table. I
don't think so...
Since OOo cannot fix the buggy font this is not an OOo issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
