To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56560
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 23:22:05 -0700 2005 ------- VI-->ES: It is not just being "considered as ""untouched"" " issue. The solution is to make tables in OO more conscious of themselves, so to speak, by improving the usage of a "rowspan" variables and/or introducing several new variables that (only in some specific cases) keep track of which rows of the rest of the table the cells that are being split/merged are spanning. In short, a more "conscious" relation between the cells that are, or were split/merged and the rest of the table must somehow be established. By no means it is easy to find an elegant solution but it MUST be done. I could possibly help with the logic of it. Putting it down to P3 is not so good for OO success, I think. It is P1 to me, however I would only agree that at least P2 is accurate. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
