To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29417
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 05:17:53 -0800 2005 ------- No. If it works for some other platform it is likely to be by chance only. And also not having a reasonable minimal value may affect performance and stability. For example: if you have a tab-stop every 1/100th mm the number of tabsops is quite large and thus accessing a specific tabstop will become slower. Also from implementation side the tab-stops are likely to be stored in some array, with a fixed upper bound for the index (let's say USHORT_MAX for example which is about 65536) if by allowing such tiny values for tab-stops the maximal number for tab-stops will be above that (sth that actually may happen depending on the specified page width) the array might be too small and if per chance there is no proper bounds checking implemented the office may crash. And even if proper bounds checking is implemented any tab-stop above that limit will be of no use because the values can not be stored. So forcing some decent 'real-life' value should be the way to go even if from pure API view there would be no such need. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
