To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 1 05:54:59 -0800 2005 ------- Hmm, I see; but still this does not sound to me like the right thing for long-term... Why don't you want to use stlport? Does it have problems on FreeBSD? Wouldn't it be better to fix stlport then? The goal of porting is to be able to compile OOo on the target platform without modifications - like when one runs ./configure on FreeBSD/amd64, bootstrap & dmake, and gets a working OOo - but it must not break the other platforms. And also, all this should be possible without running an additional script that modifies the sources. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
