To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 2 08:04:01 -0800
2005 -------
giuliano1969 : The patch does not need to handle the case of '+table.A1' because
it is written to look only for the very specific case of [+-]{formated number}.
table.A1 is not a number nor is .A1. The closest we would come to a problem
would be with some of the work I'm doing for R1C1 style addresses. That change
also adds support for MS Excel style A1 addresses. Which include full row
references of the form '2:2'. Which means that a user could conceiveable enter
+2:2. However, even that would not cause a problem because
1) 2:2 is not a valid number. We would match only on the leading 2 then fail
2) Even if there is a custom number format that could somehow produce 2:2
(something like #:0). It makes absolutely no sense as an expression.
Anyone that goes that far out of their way deserves to have '+2:2' get
entered as the constant 22.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
