To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58973
                  Issue #:|58973
                  Summary:|gcc:4-1: strange usage of String classes
                Component:|Word processor
                  Version:|680m142
                 Platform:|PC
                      URL:|
               OS/Version:|Linux
                   Status:|NEW
        Status whiteboard:|
                 Keywords:|
               Resolution:|
               Issue type:|PATCH
                 Priority:|P3
             Subcomponent:|code
              Assigned to:|mru
              Reported by:|pmladek





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec  6 09:21:44 -0800 
2005 -------
I got this error with gcc-4.1-pre:
--- cut ---
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/ooo-build-src680.139.3/build/src680-m139/sw/source/core/
swg/SwXMLTextBlocks1.cxx: In member function ‘virtual ULONG
SwXMLTextBlocks::GetDoc(USHORT)’:
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/ooo-build-src680.139.3/build/src680-m139/sw/source/core/
swg/SwXMLTextBlocks1.cxx:142: error: no match for ‘operator+’ in ‘aFolderName + 
String::CreateFromAscii(const sal_Char*)()’
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/ooo-build-src680.139.3/build/src680-m139/solver/680/unxlngi6.pro/inc/tools/fract.hxx:135:
note: candidates are: Fraction operator+(const Fraction&, const Fraction&)
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/ooo-build-src680.139.3/build/src680-m139/solver/680/unxlngi6.pro/inc/tools/gen.hxx:660:
note:                 Rectangle operator+(const 
Rectangle&, const Point&)
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/ooo-build-src680.139.3/build/src680-m139/solver/680/unxlngi6.pro/inc/tools/gen.hxx:202:
note:                 Point operator+(const Point&, const Point&)
--- cut ---

It seems that the operator + is not defined for the class String. There was an
ugly conditional hack for MS Win that one string was retyped to (OUString). I
thing that it is a waste of time to convert the strings to OUString, which
provides the operator +, and then convert them back to String.

I rather used the oparator += which is provides by the class String as well. I
also removed the obsolete hack for MS Win.

I wonder how it could work with older gcc.

I'll attach the patch. I could commit it to the CWS gcc41 if you agree.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to