To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45689
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 15 02:29:55 -0800 2005 ------- This seems to me to be a regression from OOo 1.1.x. With regard to the comments from ama about "what is correct", I agree that it is debatable whether "1over2" should be accepted as a fraction. However, consider the case of polynomials. In OOo 1.1.x, with an expression such as x^2+3x+5 (with the usual font settings: italic for variables, non-italic for numbers), both "x"s are rendered in italic (correctly). In OOo 2.0, with an expression such as x^2+3x+5, the first "x" is rendered in italic but the second is not. Suely this should not be regarded as the correct behaviour? It seems that the expression 3x is treated as a number rather than being recognised as a number followed by a variable. A workaround is to enter a space between the 3 and the x ie x^2+3 x+5, but (a) this is irritating to remember every time (b) it makes formulae harder to read in the formula editor --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
