To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58326
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 16 00:38:29 -0800 2005 ------- I just noticed that there is a practice of changing the summary to suit the diagnosis. While that may work for poorly worded issues, often it ends up twisting the projected issue altogether. It has happened with other issues I have raised, and this post may carry traces of the frustration I am feeling right now. In this case, I do not have a problem against the tooltip: I have raised an issue against the basic behavior itself. This is like I am saying, "This gun is not able to hit its target, so please make it more accurate". And the workaround is, "Paint a bull's eye around the place where it manages to hit". How can the two be equivalent? Granted that thousands of issues must be stretching your resources, but this is surely not the way. Please do not mess up the original message like this. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
