To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59584
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 22 01:21:22 -0800 2005 ------- fs->oj: I checked in Fred's patch (in CWS dba202d). This prevents the data loss insofar as now the column name cannot be changed anymore. However, now the table design asks the user whether the primary key should be deleted, of which ch1 is a part. This is somewhat strange, isn't it? Shouldn't we tell something like "the column could not be changed, should it be deleted/re-created?"? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
