To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60698





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb  2 06:31:51 -0800 
2006 -------
nemeth->mmeeks, tl: Hi, I'm very fond of this patch. I would like to improve it
with the following morphological extension:

OOoDICT1
lang: <none>
type: positive
---
furtivelyhutch
sjkdhkjshfddksj/word

Where "word" is a dictionary item in the "lang" spell checking (and
morphological) dictionary. For example:

Tesco/John
xexexe/change

means, that Tesco can combine with affixes of John: Tesco's and
xexexe can be suffixed, as change: xexexes, xexexed etc.

Or more better, we can specify the right homonym with Hunspell's morphological 
item:

xexexe/change VERB
yeyeye/change NOUN

I have made an issue for this:

http://lingucomponent.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61525

Thomas, Michael? What do you think, how can we solve the user dictionary and
spell checker integration?

For example: spell checker loads the relevant user dictionaries, and
need a new fuction in the spell checker API: reload_user_dictionary(),
it is called, when user add new words to the user dictionary.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to