To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61685
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 9 15:53:15 -0800 2006 ------- IM(nsv)HO: - thinking EE's have any relevant infulence on used diskspace/memory is a sign of misunderstanding of the real code base of OOo. - EE's have nothing to do with security, being trusthworthy of code, quality control or whatsoever. Malicious code could be made in many ways, by purpose or not. An author putting EE and malicious code at one line, just doesn't understand. Thinking that software is more secure because no EE are present, is just not rational. - EE's never came up as possible issue in my professional/business contacts (office software). - for our school going children, there are many (possible) threats on the computer/internet, that have nothing to do with EE's. - there's not at all an argumented obvious contra EE's outcome, in Larry Osterman's weblog. EE's are not a culprit, nor a danger, above all no vehicles for Trojan Horses (it's open source software: 'look, threre they are' :-) just some fun, a harmless privilege for the coders. If we consider this, I would advice that we leave the developers (and ourselves) with the more important issues. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
