To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62265
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 26 22:39:08 -0800 2006 ------- cmc: thanks for your comment. > Are you sure you really want to get involved in doing > all of the micro fixes in > OOo build env, instead of just fixing the outer environment to use > gij as > java ? > e.g. using the jpackage infrastructure ? Could you explain a bit more? adding another dependency is not a good idea, and if you think so, gcj should install thier interpriter as java, gcj as javac somewhere appropreate. this should not be a OOo side problem. and from Jpackage project, one of its goal is > To establish an efficient and robust policy for Java software installation. IMHO this is what debian or rpm or other packages managers should do. Personally I want to stick to original, vanilla installation of gcj. So # of problems (required environment variables) are not so large, so I'd like to go ahead. They are just only minor problems. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
