To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62492
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 10 04:34:28 -0800 2006 ------- Hello intersol, let us gather some facts concerning this file format of your example document. 1) Although it has the suffix XLS it is clearly no binary XLS 2) When you take a look into the W3C XML specification http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-20040204/#sec-well-formed You see that a well-formed XML document starts with a prolog [1] document ::= prolog element Misc* [22] prolog ::= XMLDecl? Misc* (doctypedecl Misc*)? [23] XMLDecl ::= '<?xml' VersionInfo EncodingDecl? SDDecl? S? '?>' As you see for a well-formed XML document, there are no arbitrary prefix before the prolog. A document that has these bytes is therefore not well-formed and thereby can not be valid at all. Although aside of this three bytes the document would be well-formed and most likely valid. Therefore you have bring up an interesting bug of Microsoft Office, that we should take into account to ease the life of StarOffice / OpenOffice.org users. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
