To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63405
                  Issue #:|63405
                  Summary:|OUStringHash and OStringHash would benefit from
                          |better docs
                Component:|porting
                  Version:|OOo 2.0.2
                 Platform:|All
                      URL:|
               OS/Version:|All
                   Status:|NEW
        Status whiteboard:|
                 Keywords:|
               Resolution:|
               Issue type:|PATCH
                 Priority:|P5
             Subcomponent:|documentation
              Assigned to:|mh
              Reported by:|mikeleib





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 20 11:07:18 -0800 
2006 -------
I was recently coding and needed to make a hash_map with OUStrings as keys.  I
first tried: hash_map<rtl::OUString, some_other_type>, think that perhaps the
appropriate methods had been insterted into the std namespace.  This was not the
case.  

I looked at the C++ reference, and created the struct that I would need to do
this.  I thought that it might be in some helper and asked on IRC.  I found that
it was already implimented, and documented (rtl::OUStringHash).  However, it is
not really easy to find (not part of OUString class docs, instead a struct in
the rtl namespace).  Perhaps a reference to it in the hashCode method docs would
be helpful.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to