To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63418
User mru changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 21 03:53:29 -0800
2006 -------
The current behaviour is a kind of "industry standard". The ODF definition may
be just "incomplete" in this case, because there are not enough resources to
document everything into the last detail.
Well, at first it may assume that "do not split" is implied in "keep with next".
But the current behaviour is also used by other WordProcessors and it gives the
user two possibilites: "keep" without "split" and keep with "split". So why
disallow one of the two possibilities? I think, this will make many users quite
angry...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
