To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=42547
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 14 05:02:04 -0800 2005 ------- sb->taniguchi: - Is the Solaris SPARC GCC port in general and this bridge code in particular working properly already? That is, would it be useful if you created a CWS for the port, or is it mature enough to put this patch on the main trunk? Please don't get me wrong, but I would not like to put code for an experimental port into the bridges module, if that port might be abandoned again in the future, and the code would keep lying around. - Have you signed the JCA? The list contains Taniguchi Yasuaki---is that you? - For the TODO in bridges::cpp_uno::shared::VtableFactory::flushCode in cpp2uno.cxx, you might want to look at the solution used in bridges/source/cpp_uno/cc50_solaris_sparc/cpp2uno.cxx 1.16 (together with bridges/source/cpp_uno/cc50_solaris_sparc/call.s 1.5). --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
