To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=35555
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 22 01:50:22 -0800 2006 ------- Lutz: you're quite right - turns out the file name is irrelevant in this just the number; try: http://www.openoffice.org/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/35096/gnome-industrial-new.png vs. http://www.openoffice.org/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/35095/gnome-industrial-old.png The number in the URI being (apparently) the critical bit ;-) and (URGH) - looking at this more closely, it looks as if the algorithm is in fact slightly different; or there is some offsetting prolem that degrades the look of (at least) 1 icon in OO.o I've checked: investigating that. Either that or we're still not using the fix in comment 5 (yet). --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
