I agree that mine is a duplicate of 35292. Is it possible to change the
title of 35292 to be more accurate?
35292 is about deleting a field definition, not a (cross) reference to
the field definition.
Putting both terms "delete field definition" and "cross reference" would
help us find existing bugs and cut down on duplicate filings.
Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said the following on 3/29/2006 2:02 PM:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63778
User lars changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
CC|'' |'lars'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |oooqa
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 29 14:02:38 -0800
2006 -------
duplicate
*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 35292 ***
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
