To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63927
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 18 08:13:17 -0700 2006 ------- >> - shlib.cxx: There is no get_this_libpath anywhere in sal >> SRC680m160. > > no ? not in bootstrap.cxx ? - cvs history says it is. what revision of that file? >> - shlib.cxx, lcl_isInternalLibrary: sal is part of URE, but >> libexlink.so cannot be part of URE, as it contains information about >> OOo-specific (non-URE) UNO types. The hard-coded approach to dlopen >> libexlink.so from within sal when needed is thus too naive. > > Yes - of course ;-) if you can come up with a better plan I'm all > for it. We can register a callback with UNO I guess from some upper > level - but ... this is your world. What is needed is clear, how to > structure it is not (to me). So, some work ahead in the 2.0.4 timeframe before this patch can be included... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
