To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55967
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 2 14:10:17 -0700 2006 ------- > Always using what can be found on the system is nice if you think of OOo > as something which is always build and distributed together with an OS. It does not have to come with the OS, but it is always built for the particular OS. It is better to require certain libraries/packages to be installed, than to provide your own versions of them all. This is also known as "DLL hell". OOo would save itself A LOT of work if it stopped trying to maintain the 3rd-party chunks of the tree, and concentrated instead on the core OOo software. It would also reduce the distribution tarballs and cut the build times. By building *everything* from scratch, you are either duplicating (often poorly) or even defeating the work of the system integrators, because the superior streamlined versions are not built routinely and bit-rot occurs. > On the other hand tidying up unused STL header inclusions is always a good > thing, can you extract them from the patch? The patch largely consists of just that. The renaming work is done by the script. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
